DOCTORS IN TYLER OR LONGVIEW OR EAST TEXAS

JOHN RAYMOND BAKER DC

2011-10-13T09:52:00.001-07:00

http://www.johnraymondbaker.com/john_raymond_baker_dc.htm
New webpage with information about John Raymond Baker, DC,
the doctor and his practice. Dr John Raymond Baker, DC really
cares about patients and puts them first every day.

http://www.carwreckdoctor.com/chiropractors-who-care.htm

2011-07-16T13:45:00.003-07:00

http://www.carwreckdoctor.com/chiropractors-who-care.htm

http://chiropractorwhocares.leadhoster.com NEW SITE IN PROGRESS

2011-07-15T15:43:00.001-07:00

http://chiropractorwhocares.leadhoster.com

NEW SITE IN PROGRESS

http://bakerchiropractic.eu.pn- NEW SITE OF BAKER CHIROPRACTIC OF LONGVIEW TEXAS

2011-02-22T17:58:00.001-08:00

http://bakerchiropractic.eu.pn

http://www.carwreckdoctor.com

2011-01-23T20:02:00.001-08:00

http://www.carwreckdoctor.com

YOU AREN'T A CRASH TEST DUMMY, SO YOU DESERVE MORE THAN DRUGS, YOU DESERVE CARE

2010-06-28T01:02:00.001-07:00

http://www.bakerchiropractic.net/crashtestdummy.htm

A TALE TOLD BY AN IDIOT, FULL OF SOUND AND FURY, SIGNIFYING NOTHING...A REVIEW OF MS. MERCER'S ARTICLE

2010-06-13T14:57:00.001-07:00

A TALE TOLD BY AN IDIOT, FULL OF SOUND AND FURY, SIGNIFYING NOTHING...A REVIEW OF MS. MERCER'S ARTICLE

PUBLISHED 06/13/2010 - 2:49 P.M. CST

RATE THIS ARTICLE:

Email this to a friend

Print PDF

Print HTML

My undergraduate degree is in Psychology, and after getting my baccalaureate, it looked like having a BS in Psychology, and 50 cents, would buy you a cup of coffee (meaning it was worthless), so, I applied for and was accepted in the Masters program at my alma mater, but after being there a week, the master's program was much different than I anticipated, because, like a Southwest cattleman's field, it was full of so much bovine feces, it was intolerable ( I don't know if you've been in a scorching field full of bull excrement in July, but , it's the closest thing you can get to being in a master's program in Psychology).

My late uncle was in a field dealing with the mind, but he was a Psychiatrist, specializing in Psychoanalysis (more BS if you ask me, "Pappa Freud" being a bit on the , "odd" side, shall we say), but the difference between my late uncle, and the psycho-logist, Ms. Mercer, is that he could prescribe drugs, had more clout when he talked, and went to school a hell of a lot longer.

That being said, PhD "Dr." Mercer's attack on the ability of Chiropractic to help children with the purported "disease" of ADHD is found, for your amusement, at

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/child-myths/201006/chiropractic-treatment-behavior-problems-when-is-evidence-not-evidence .

Now, to see a writer's style, sometimes I look at the last line of their piece.

The last line of her article, declares for all the world to see, how totally ignorant the woman is about Chiropractic. Her last line, I quote :

"By the way, when did the adjective "chiropractic" become a noun?"
Well, PhD "Doctor" Mercer, the answer to that is 1895, when Chiropractic began. It is a noun in the same way that medicine (as in, the practice of medicine) is a noun. It makes me wonder where you went to school, that they would graduate someone SO STUPID, that they would write an article attacking a discipline they obviously, haven't exercised the least bit of scholastic enterprise to gain insight into.

But, since you obviously are not a fan of Chiropractic, let's talk about YOUR little profession, and the lack of efficacy of its methods, shall we ?

Number one, I find it odd that you are in a backhanded way attacking Chiropractic, since psychology and Chiropractic are both under attack from the SOPP movement (Scope of Practice Partnership), in which the AMA would like nothing better than both Doctors of Chiropractic and Psychologists, to be legally barred from diagnosing their own patients. Thus, if SOPP has their way, you would not be able to even DIAGNOSE a case of ADHD. For more on SOPP, see my blog at http://STOPSOPP.blogspot.com.

Now, as far as efficacy of methods, and outcomes basing, name ONE condition, disease, mental illness, that you can guarantee you can successfully cure someone of, PhD "Dr" Mercer ! Please name it and be ready to defend your assertion. Psychology has a LOUSY history of treating and curring ANYONE.

Firstly, IS PSYCHOLOGY A "REAL" SCIENCE ? I think if PhD "Dr" Mercer wants to do a diatribe about how someone else is not following good evidenciary protocols in designing a study, perhaps she needs to meet the Daubert standard as an expert in science herself.

Let's start with this webpage. http://www.arachnoid.com/psychology/index.html
"The items listed above inevitably create an atmosphere in which absolutely anything goes (at least temporarily), judgments about efficacy are utterly subjective, and as a result, the field of psychology perpetually splinters into cults and fads (examples below). “Studies” are regularly published that would never pass muster with a self-respecting peer review committee from some less soft branch of science.

If society correctly evaluated human psychology as a loose grouping of subjective cults and fads, the above summary would not pose any kind of social problem. But in fact there are people who still think human psychology is based in science, all evidence to the contrary. The sad result is that society's engine of legal and social authority is sometimes steered by psychology, sometimes with unjust and terrible consequences. Here is a brief list of historical examples in which psychology's bogus status as a science has produced harm (it is by no means a comprehensive list):

During World War I, psychologist R. M. Yerkes oversaw the testing of 1.7 million US Army draftees. His questionable conclusions were to have far-reaching consequences, leading to a 1924 law placing severe limitations on the immigration of those groups Yerkes and his followers believed to be mentally unfit – Jews and Eastern Europeans in particular. Yerkes later thoroughly recanted his methods and findings in an 800-page confession/tome that few bothered to read, and the policies he set in motion had the dreadful side effect of preventing the immigration of Jews trying to escape the predations of Hitler and his henchmen later on.
The original test results happened to dovetail with Yerkes' explicit eugenic beliefs, a fact lost on nearly everyone at the time.
In an effort to answer the question of whether intelligence is primarily governed by environment or genes, psychologist Cyril Burt (1883-1971) performed a long-term study of twins that was later shown to be most likely a case of conscious or unconscious scientific fraud. His work, which purported to show that IQ is largely inherited, was used as a “scientific” basis by various racists and others, and, despite having been discredited, still is.
- In the 1950s, at the height of psychology's public acceptance, neurologistWalter Freeman created a surgical procedure known as "prefrontal lobotomy." As though on a quest and based solely on his reputation and skills of persuasion, Freeman singlehandedly popularized lobotomy among U.S. psychologists, eventually performing about 3500 lobotomies, before the dreadful consequences of this practice became apparent.
  At the height of Freeman's personal campaign, he drove around the country in a van he called the "lobotomobile," performing lobotomies as he traveled. There was plenty of evidence that prefrontal lobotomy was a catastrophic clinical practice, but no one noticed the evidence or acted on it. There was — and is — no reliable mechanism within clinical psychology to prevent this sort of abuse.
These examples are part of a long list of people who have tried to use psychology to give a scientific patina to their personal beliefs, perhaps beginning with Francis Galton (1822-1911), the founder and namer of eugenics. Galton tried (and failed) to design psychological tests meant to prove his eugenic beliefs. This practice of using psychology as a personal soapbox continues to the present, in fact, it seems to have become more popular.
What these accounts have in common is that no one was able (or willing) to use scientific standards of evidence to refute the claims at the time of their appearance, because psychology is only apparently a science. Only through enormous efforts and patience, including sometimes repeating an entire study using the original materials, can a rare, specific psychological claim be refuted. Such exceptions aside, there is ordinarily no recourse to the “testable, falsifiable claims” criterion that sets science apart from ordinary human behavior.
One might think that psychology might have learned from its past errors and evolved into a more strict and scientific enterprise. In fact the reverse seems to be the case. Here are two contemporary examples:
Facilitated Communication
This bogus field sprang into existence, fueled by the wish that specific disabled (autistic, severely retarded) people might be able to communicate with their loved ones after all. It purports to allow communication with a disabled person through the agency of a facilitator, someone who typically holds a writing implement (or operates a keyboard) simultaneously with the disabled person, and the two together create a written account of the disabled person's otherwise inaccessible experiences. Frequently, the “communication” seems to reveal that the disabled person is being abused horribly by parents or caretakers. This in turn has resulted in bogus legal actions, spurred by prosecutors who think psychology is a science.
Was this set of beliefs tested and shown to be flawed in a scientific study? No. Was it called into question because of the utterly fantastic content of the “communications”? No again. How then was the fraud uncovered? Well, the PBS television program “Frontline” showed up and taped some typical clinical practice, revealing some aspects of the practice anyone not brain-damaged should have been able to notice, such as the fact that the disabled person was often looking at the ceiling while supposedly coöperating in keyboard communication, a behavior that requires one to look at the keyboard at least occasionally. The facilitator, of course, was looking intently at the keyboard.
And finally, after evidence of the bogus nature of both the practice and the communications was demonstrated, was the field abandoned? Of course not – it is still widely practiced, with the difference that TV cameras are now typically excluded from the clinics.
Recovered Memory Therapy
In this variation on the above bogus practice, talk-therapy clients are guided to “recovering” repressed memories, typically of horrible childhood abuse, sexual and otherwise. And, like the above practice, these “recovered memories” sometimes cause people to be jailed for vivid, if imaginary, crimes.
In this case, unlike the above, over time the frequency and implausibility of the actionable claims ruined everything for the eager practitioners, and most clients later decided they were talked into the “memories” by the therapist. There have been a number of lawsuits by disgruntled former clients, and wrongly convicted people have been freed.
But, just as in the case of “facilitated communication,” science played no role in either the creation or destruction of this aberration, this fad. Science played no part in the creation of either field, although properly designed experiments could have been used at the outset to prove that both fads were not remotely what their advocates claimed. And science had little role to play in the later debunking, because psychology is only coincidentally addressed by science.
Some may object that the revolution produced by psychoactive drugs has finally placed psychology on a firm scientific footing, but the application of these drugs is not psychology, it is pharmacology. The efficacy of drugs in treating conditions once thought to be psychological in origin simply presents another example where psychology got it wrong, and the errors could only be uncovered using disciplines outside psychology.
To summarize this section, psychology is the sort of field that can describe things, but as shown above, it cannot reliably explain what it has described. In science, descriptions are only a first step — explanations are essential:
- An explanation, a theory, allows one to make a prediction about observations not yet made.
- A prediction would permit a laboratory test that might support or falsify the underlying theory.
- The possibility of falsification is what distinguishes science from cocktail chatter. "
  
  HMMMM....OK, some great points that would TEND, or "SUGGEST"
  strongly, that Psychology is NOT a "real science" in the usual sense of the word.
  
  There is an old saying about the pot calling the kettle black, and this is an apt saying with regard to this silly and groundless attack of Phd "Dr" Mercer's attack on this study.
Prove that YOU have the ability to have repeatable accounts and that you have ANY efficacy of curing ANY condition, illness, or disease which is within your scope of practice PdD "Dr" Mercer. Psychology, as was previously pointed out, tends to be a collection of cults, who view the world and people through the eyes of whichever Psychology Guru they follow, whether it be Jung, Freud, Adler, or whoever.

My undergraduate degree in the discipline was extremely easy for me to get because, the field is based on so much touchy feely crap. Unlike organic chemistry, where one can perform the Grignard reaction over and over and get the same result, you could administer the MMPI to the same person on several trials and get different results.

You could have a normal person go to five different "psychologists" and get five different "diagnoses".

So, "Dr" Mercer, how many children with ADHD have YOU cured ? How many ADULTS with ADHD have you see ANYONE cure ? How many cases of paranoid schizophrenia have you cured ? How many cases of bipolar disorder have you "cured"?

Since you liked to end your idiotic piece with a question, then so shall I.

When did Developmental Psychology develop a protocol to cure ANYONE of ANYTHING at ANYTIME and have repeatable positive
results ?

New webpage added w/ video

2010-05-21T05:40:00.001-07:00

http://bakerchiropractic.net/bakerchiropracticoflongview.htm

GREAT NEW PAGES ON CHIROPRACTIC IN LONGVIEW TEXAS

2009-12-13T10:15:00.001-08:00

http://www.drugfreepainmanagement.net/longviewchiropractor.htm

http://www.DOCTORINLONGVIEW.COM/longviewchiropractor.htm

http://www.LONGVIEWCHIROPRACTIC.net/longviewchiropractor.htm

GREAT NEW PAGE ABOUT WHIPLASH AND CAR WRECK INJURIES AND TREATMENT - FROM BAKER CHIROPRACTIC

2009-12-12T09:06:00.001-08:00

http://whiplash-effects.blogspot.com/

CHECK OUT OUR NEWEST WEBSITE AND DOMAIN

2009-09-16T13:37:00.000-07:00

CHECK OUT OUR NEWEST WEBSITE AND DOMAIN

http://www.doctorintexas.com

FREE HEALTHCARE WOULD BE GREAT- SUPPORT THE PUBLIC, SINGLE PAYER OPTION

2009-08-21T07:29:00.001-07:00

WHY WHOLE FOODS CEO's PLAN FOR ALTERNATIVE TO OBAMACARE IS IDIOTIC

2009-08-17T15:44:00.001-07:00

"The controversy over Whole Foods CEO John Mackey's anti-ObamaCare stance is now well into its third round. It all started with Mackey's August 11 op-ed in the Wall Street Journal. In it, Mackey argued that "the last thing our country needs is a massive new health-care entitlement that will create hundreds of billions of dollars of new unfunded deficits and move us much closer to a government takeover of our health-care system." He presented, instead, The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare:

1. "Remove the legal obstacles that slow the creation of high-deductible health insurance plans and health savings accounts."
2. "Equalize the tax laws so that employer-provided health insurance and individually owned health insurance have the same tax benefits."
3. Allow competition across state lines.
4. "Repeal government mandates regarding what insurance companies must cover."
5. "Enact tort reform."
6. "Make costs transparent."
7. "Enact medicare reform."
8. Revise tax law to make it easier to donate to those without insurance."
-------------------snip-------------------
These "top 8" solutions, the WHOLE FOODS ALTERNATIVE gives this blogger the idea
he SHOULD and will NOW boycott Whole Foods. Who knows, Readers Digent is going into bankruptcy so, maybe with a little boycotting we can do that to WF (Whole Foods).
1. Insurance companies are certainly a problem, but he does not spell out these "legal obstacle". Actually, there are none, since insurance companies are so
poorly regulated in my experience, they get away with murder. We have around
50 million with no health care insurance because of the draconian rules of
"for profit" insurance companies.
2. Health insurance is just plain TOO EXPENSIVE and that's why most small business
owners don't / can't offer it to their employees. Tax breaks will have no substantial effect, and as a small business owner, I can tell you that.
3. Allow competition across state lines. LOL..are you talking about Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Minnesota compete with BC/BS of Texas? Get a grip Mackey, you don't know what the hell you are talking about.
4. Is just so much bovine feces it's not even worth wasting digital print over.
5. "Exact tort reform". Idiots like Mackey have NO idea of what they are talking about. The words "tort reform" is usually anti-patient legislation meant at capping
recovery on Med Mal cases. Number one, a large study showed that where these caps were instituted state by state, the costs of Med Mal coverage for doctors did NOT drop and in fact, in many cases, MED MAL premiums continued to rise.
BAD DOCTORS WHO HURT PATIENTS NOT ONLY NEED TO BE SUED, BUT SHOULD HAVE THEIR
LICENSE TAKEN AWAY TO MAKE WAY FOR GOOD DOCTORS!
6."Make costs transparent" - Your health insurance costs you a grand a month...
that doesn't need more transparency...you NEED a government single payer to deal with this kind of GREED!
7."Enact medicare reform." - Good Luck SLICK!
8."Revise tax law to make it easier to donate to those without insurance."-
This last one really shows how OUT OF TOUCH Mackey the Lackey is with the working man, and shows how really retarded the "trickle downers" are. The notion that the rich, who often got to be rich by ripping other people off, and having predatory business methods, suddenly get hearts of gold and start shelling out billions for those without insurance, smacks of the kind of retardation that George Bush had.

Rich people like money. Rich people are greedy. Rich people don't donate to enable FIFTY MILLION WITHOUT HEALTH CARE INSURANCE to suddenly have it. This isn't a five dollar handout proposition. The ONLY way to insure at free or affordable costs 1/6 of the population, is through government intervention and single payer, ala Canada, Great Britain, or even hybrid care like France.

REFORM HEALTH CARE NOW !

2009-08-06T07:47:00.001-07:00

http://www.drjohnbaker.com/healthcaredoctor.htm

2009-07-29T10:51:00.001-07:00

http://www.drjohnbaker.com/healthcaredoctor.htm

Embed of my DrJohnBakerDC channel from YouTubve

2009-07-05T09:50:00.000-07:00

WHAT MOST BULLS LEAVE IN THE PASTURE, A FEDERAL JUDGE SPEWS FORTH AS A JUDGMENT

2009-07-03T11:42:00.000-07:00

"Respected Federal Judge" calls an Orthopaedic surgeon a "hired gun" http://www.vamedmal.com/library/judge-calls-treating-doctor-hired-gunnot-good-for-accident-victim.cfm "In a recent Virginia car accident case, a federal judge through out the doctor's testimony, calling it unreliable.Here's what the doctor did:1. based his opinion on cause of injury solely on the patient's self report2. did not adequately investigate the relevant medical history3. failed to discover 2 prior car accidents4. failed to know about prior knee and back injury which resulted in ongoing neck and back pain5. failed to discover right arm and trapezius pain that prexisted the accident6. failed to discover the reason for a visit to the emergency department one month before the accident (during which the claimant compalined of knee pain and swelling.7. failed to consider obesity and degenerative disk disease as alternative sources of ongoing pain." ---------------SNIP============ Name ONE human being over the age of 40 whose body is in perfect shape prior to an accident. With age, previous accidents, osteoarthritic changes, fractures, sprain/strains, replacement of normal tissue with fibrotic deposts after previous injuries, most human beings have SOMETHING in their body that is not perfect, something that is not as they were when they were 15 years old. Aging is a fact of life. BUT, IT IS DISINGENOUS to say that because someone had an injury in the past, or some sort of complaint, that they cannot be injured in a wreck or that all the complaints after an accident, were pre-existing. This , if not an outright lie or attempt to deny the obvious, flies in the face of a "reasonable person's common sense" and experience. This judge, with all due respect, is full of what bulls leave in a pile in a pasture, with one difference, their leavings can help grass grow green. This judge's words have NO value.

SENATE BILL 1314 IS DEAD THANKS TO THE TCA, AND THANKS TO MANY PEOPLE

2009-06-01T09:07:00.001-07:00

I am happy to report that in Texas, SENATE BILL 1314, AN ATTACK ON CHIROPRACTIC, IS DEAD. This good outcome comes as a result of the hard work of the TCA as well as doctors, patients, and citizens across our State who stood up and said NO to this bizarre attack on Chiropractic. But, it does leave many of us asking the question, WHY DID REPUBLICAN LAWYER CHRIS HARRIS, BORN IN CALIFORNIA, INTRODUCE SB 1314 TO BEGIN WITH ?

BAKER CHIROPRACTIC OPPOSES SB 1314 AND ANYONE WHO VOTES FOR IT

2009-05-25T19:18:00.001-07:00

BAKER CHIROPRACTIC OPPOSES SB 1314 AND ANYONE WHO VOTES FOR IT

BAKER CHIROPRACTIC OPPOSES SB 1314 AND ANYONE WHO VOTES FOR IT. ALL REPRESENTATIVES IN TEXAS NEED TO BE AWARE THAT CHIROPRACTIC DOCTORS, THEIR SPOUSES, THEIR FAMILIES, FRIENDS, AND PATIENTS, FEEL THAT SENATE BILL SB 1314 IS A DIRECT ATTACK ON US AS DOCTORS, AND ON THE CHIROPRACTIC PROFESSION. ANY REPRESENTATIVE WHO VOTES FOR SENATE BILL SB 1314 IS ATTACKING CHIROPRACTIC, AND WE WILL USE OUR VOTES ACCORDINGLY. CHIROPRACTIC DOCTORS ARE LIKE ELEPHANTS. WE NEVER FORGET FRIENDS OR THOSE WHO ATTACK US.

Labels: CHRIS HARRIS, ENEMY OF CHIROPRACTIC, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, LAWYER, REPUBLICAN, SENATE BILL 1314, TEXAS

party in the pines 2009, biker rally in longview texas

2009-05-18T12:57:00.000-07:00

HTML clipboard

"Party in the Pines 2009"
If you are going on the ride...

BIKERS - WELCOME TO LONGVIEW AND EAST TEXAS.
GOT BACK PAIN FROM THE LONG RIDE ?
BAKER COMPUTER HAS GOT YOUR BACK !

For many folks, riding a bike is a freeing experience. The wind in your hair, sun on your back,
roar of the engine. But, part of the overall biking experience is that many people either
develop back problems, or already existing back problems are aggravated by riding long hours.

At BAKER CHIROPRACTIC, PA in Longview at 1420 McCann Road, Longview TX, we KNOW
how disabling back pain can be.

If your run is being interfered with because your back is killing you, call 903-753-5400 to
schedule an appointment. We also accept walk-ins.

At BAKER CHIROPRACTIC, PA , we also salute and honor all our servicemen and servicewomen
and thank them for their service to our country.

Ride free of pain...contact BAKER CHIROPRACTIC, PA AT 903-753-5400 TODAY !

KEYWORDS = party in the pines, bikes, bikers, bike, motorcycle, run, ride, may, 2009,
Longview Fairgrounds Complex, 1123 Jaycee Dr, Longview, TX, troops, servicemen, country,
army, marines, military

SAY NO TO A MEDICAL BOARD MONOPOLY OF ACUPUNCTURE

2009-04-22T06:08:00.001-07:00

The State Medical Board of Texas, if it gets its way through full passage of Texas Senate Bill 1314 (SB1314) would have authoritarian, draconian, and monopolistic control of the practice of acupuncture regardless of the nature of the practitioner, and in light of the actions of the TMA (Texas Medical Association), it is clear that this would be the immediate end of Chiropractic doctors' ability to practice acupuncture, or use acupuncture needles in the treatment of patients. This probably would also forbid Chiropractic doctors (many unfortunately use the term "chiropractors" which I dislike) from even doing the earlobe staples for weight control, or control of nicotine addiction in Texas. The Medical Board, in my opinion, would like nothing more than the elimination of Chiropractic, and the ability to put every complementary and alternative health system in subordination to them. The bill has passed the Texas Senate, so the last stand would be for the House of Representatives to vote it down. PLEASE contact YOUR House of Representatives representative and stress as strongly as possible, this is a bad bill, doesn't do anything good, but actually interferes with holistic health care in Texas,
STOP TEXAS SENATE BILL 1314- SAY NO TO A MEDICAL BOARD MONOPOLY

EAST TEXAS DOCTORS SHOULD PUT PATIENTS FIRST

2008-12-14T16:40:00.000-08:00

I don't care WHAT kind of doctor you go to, or where they are located, be it in Tyler Texas, Marshall Texas, Longview Texas, Gilmer Texas, Lindale Texas, Mineola Texas, or Gladewater, Gilmer, White Oak, Whitehouse, Big Sandy, or surrounding towns or cities, or even in Houston, Dallas, Austin, Corpus Christi, Fort Worth, Arlington, Cedar Park, Round Rock,
or in counties like Angelina, Smith, Gregg, Upshur, Nueces, Dallas, Harris, Hidalgo, or the rest, and whether they are Neurosurgeons, Neurologists, Urologists, Ob/Gyn, Podiatrists, Osteopaths, Pediatricians, Psychiatrists, Primary Care Physicians, Orthopaedists (often wrongly spelled "Orthopedists"), or Plastic (Reconstructive or Cosmetic) surgeons, as doctors, they should put the patient's well being, and health, first in their practice.

I am a Doctor of Chiropractic , and have been licensed as a doctor in Texas since 1989.
I have practiced in Austin, Beaumont, Tyler, and now Longview, and the placement of patients first in my practice is one of my guiding principles.

The second thing I stress is that at BAKER CHIROPRACTIC IN LONGVIEW TEXAS, we are putting the CARE back into health care. After all, it is called health CARE, not Health "I don't give a damn about you".

We offer conservative, non-surgical, non-pharmaceutical care, and offer it to folks no matter whether they come from McAllen, Nacogdoches, Linden, Lindale, Round Rock, Deer Park, or wherever they come from.

What non-surgical , non-pharmaceutical means is that we don't dope you up, we don't drug you, we don't stick hypodermic needles in you, and we don't slice you open or cut on you. Pretty cool, right? I have yet to have anyone tell me they enjoy being stuck with a hypodermic needle, or enjoy getting cut open in surgery.

We are there to assist the body to heal itself and to try to remove impediments or blockages to body function, and where possible to help restore joint and body function.

We are located at 1420 McCann Road, in the Longview shopping center called the
Brookwood Village Shopping Center.

Our phone number is 903-753-5400 and we are open Monday through Friday (excpept on holidays or special circumstances).

We also accept folks hurt on the job in on the job, Workers Compensation injuries,
as well as people injured in car wrecks / auto accidents, and we have an established
track record of working well with attorneys from California to Florida and places in between.

If you are sick and tired of being sick and tired, how about calling 903-753-5400 and making an appointment today!